Stories about Studying and Teaching

What Connects Us

Analyz­ing com­plex prob­lems from dif­fe­rent per­spec­tives and find­ing solu­tions to­gether: Dis­cover how stu­dents and in­struc­tors in inno­va­tive study pro­grams build brid­ges between a variety of disciplines.

Bridging psychology, law, theology, religious studies and philosophy: the inter­disciplinary module “Life Worth Living”.

Life’s Big Questions

What makes a life worth liv­ing? What does it mean to be hu­man? A new mo­dule re­sumes the an­cient tra­di­tion of phi­lo­so­phiz­ing on the big exis­ten­tial ques­tions at university.

Read the complete story

One Friday last Oc­to­ber, groups of around 10 peo­ple, con­sist­ing of stu­dents and in­struc­tors from UZH, vi­sit­ed Zurich’s fa­mous sights. While to an on­looker this may have looked like a guid­ed tour, there was no tour guide talk­ing about the city’s his­tory while all the others lis­tened. In­stead, there were ani­mat­ed con­ver­sa­tions tak­ing place be­tween all par­ti­ci­pants on the walk. The con­ver­sa­tions re­volved around very spe­cif­ic ques­tions. So, for exam­ple, at the Gross­münster church, par­ti­ci­pants talked about whe­ther re­treat­ing into si­lence can help figure out what makes a life worth living.

At the Linden­hof park, the group of around 40 people was asked to re­flect on how an aware­ness of being part of a long his­tory of hu­ma­nity in­fluences their lives, and whe­ther it is a com­fort or a burden.

“We want to revisit the ancient origins of the idea of university.”

Ralph Kunz

Professor of practical theology

The questions asked by par­ti­ci­pants in the mo­dule “Life Worth Living” were un­usual, but they are not new. The course, offered at UZH for the first time in the 2025 Fall Se­mes­ter, draws on the past: “We want to re­vi­sit the ancient ori­gins of the idea of uni­versity,” says Ralph Kunz, pro­fes­sor of prac­tic­al theo­logy at UZH and ini­tia­tor of the program.

The students explore life’s funda­mental questions on walks through the city – here at Lindenhof.

Ancient thinkers such as Plato and So­cra­tes would address life’s fun­da­ment­al ques­tions on walks with their stu­dents. “Their vi­sion was to en­gage in dia­logue with people to ex­plore what mat­ters in life.” As the found­ing fathers behind the idea of uni­ver­sity, they always saw it as two things: “A place for scho­lar­ly thought, but also a place for en­counter and shared phi­lo­so­phiz­ing,” says Kunz.

An enriching experience for all

Kunz firmly be­lieves that en­gag­ing with the big ques­tions in life is not only a pri­vate matter. Any­one who goes to uni­ver­sity in­evi­tably brings their per­son­al views and ex­pe­rien­ces into their stu­dies. “Get­ting the op­por­tu­ni­ty to ad­dress these ques­tions at uni­ver­sity is per­so­nal­ly en­riching, but also valu­able for study in any dis­ci­pline,” says Kunz. Be­cause it teaches you a broad range of skills, from the abi­lity to re­flect and to ex­press your thoughts clearly, to the abi­lity to value dif­fer­ent view­points and cri­ti­cal judg­ment skills. Above all, though, it teaches you to see things from other people’s perspectives.

Students develop skills in reflection, dialogue and critical judgment.

The new mo­dule was in­spired by a course by the same name “Life Worth Living” that theo­logian Miro­slav Volf has been run­ning at Yale University in the US since 2014. The idea has since been picked up at va­ri­ous uni­ver­si­ties across the world. Ralph Kunz is of­fer­ing the mo­dule in col­la­bo­ra­tion with four UZH in­struc­tors in psy­cho­logy, law, re­li­gious stu­dies and philosophy.

The ba­sic struc­ture of the course is the same as the one at Yale. The fort­nightly meet­ings al­ways focus on a cen­tral ques­tion: what does it mean to be hu­man? What is a life worth living? To whom am I res­pon­sible? How can we res­pond to suf­fer­ing and death? In pre­pa­ra­tion, stu­dents are gi­ven texts to read on these ques­tions from va­ri­ous tra­di­tions of thought and faith, and aca­de­mic dis­ci­plines. The sub­se­quent in­put from teach­ing staff usu­al­ly takes place as co-teach­ing. If the to­pic is guilt and for­give­ness, for example, the pers­pec­tives of law, theo­logy and psy­cho­logy may be integrated.

Respectful dialogue

“I rarely speak to my fel­low stu­dents and friends about such fun­da­ment­al ques­tions of life,” says Nina Bran­der. She is in her first se­mes­ter of vete­ri­na­ry me­di­cine and finds the course a valu­able ad­di­tion. Study­ing phi­lo­so­phic­al texts is new to her: “But it’s a great ex­pe­rience, and I al­ready feel more con­fi­dent doing it.” The fact that the in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary dia­logue is very res­pect­ful helps, she adds. “The par­ti­ci­pants are from a wide va­ri­ety of sub­ject areas and at va­ri­ous stages in their stu­dies. But they all try to com­mu­ni­cate clearly and ef­fec­tive­ly. And we lis­ten to each other and take other opin­ions seri­ously,” says Brander.

“We lis­ten to each other and take other opin­ions seri­ously.”

Nina Brander

Bachelor's student in Veterinary Medicine

“What I’ve found fas­ci­nat­ing, for exam­ple, was the text by an astro­phy­si­cist set­ting out his view of hu­ma­nity, and the view of in­di­ge­nous Ame­ri­can cul­tures on the co­ex­is­tence of plants, ani­mals and hu­mans,” says Bran­der. To her, one thing is clear: it’s less about the ans­wers and more about the ques­tions that this mo­dule raises. And these ques­tions also affect her every­day life.

She says the course has made her more aware of her sci­en­tif­ic mind­set, and has also ex­pand­ed it: “I now see things dif­fe­rent­ly thanks to the con­ver­sa­tions that have ta­ken place in this mo­dule.” Pre­vi­ous­ly, for exam­ple, she would have seen a tree in a fo­rest pri­ma­rily as a ha­bi­tat for ani­mals, where­as now when look­ing at trees she also thinks about things like growth and rootedness.

Professional responsibility

In view of her studies, the future vet is grate­ful for the op­por­tu­ni­ty to be able to en­gage with ques­tions such as being res­pon­sible for lives: “It helps to be pre­pared be­fore the mo­ment comes when I have to de­cide for the first time whe­ther to put a sick ani­mal to sleep.”

She was also in­spired by the as­pect of self-care in re­la­tion to the ques­tion of liv­ing a good life: “It’s well known that stu­dents and pro­fes­sio­nals work­ing in hu­man and vete­ri­nary me­di­cine are dis­pro­por­tio­na­tely affect­ed by men­tal health prob­lems. To me, it’s clear that along­side the heavy work­load, it’s es­sen­tial to carve out time for other in­te­rests and ade­quate rest. The course has em­po­wered me to take that se­ri­ous­ly,” says Brander.

Cooking and sharing meals together helps parti­cipants strike up conver­sations and ex­change views on deeply personal questions about life.

Not only does the course in­tro­duce stu­dents to dif­fe­rent per­spec­tives on life from sci­ence, re­li­gion and their fel­low stu­dents, it is also struc­tured dif­fe­rent­ly from a tra­di­tion­al se­mi­nar. Stu­dents and in­struc­tors in “Life Worth Living” are on first-name terms, and the mo­dule includes a two-day block course, during which par­ti­ci­pants walk around Zurich to­gether, but also cook and eat meals to­gether. “This also helps to start con­ver­sa­tions and share per­so­nal ex­pe­ri­en­ces in re­la­tion to life’s big ques­tions,” says Ralph Kunz.

Next edition in the 2026 Fall Semester

At the final ses­sion of the mo­dule, stu­dents will have the op­por­tu­ni­ty to talk with Yale theo­lo­gian Miro­slav Volf online. Nina Bran­der is look­ing for­ward to this. “We’re step­ping out of the con­fines of our sub­ject areas, talk­ing about un­fa­mil­iar to­pics and get­ting to know other per­spec­tives.”

This is pre­cise­ly what she had hoped to get out of the course. And she’s not the only one. The mo­dule filled up quickly. It will be of­fered again in the 2026 Fall Semester.

Breaking free of the usual ways of thinking and influences: Political science and economics student Gregor von Rohr took part in an Entre­preneur Boot­camp at UZH.

Pulling Together

If you want to be an entre­pre­neur, you have to be able to col­la­bo­rate and de­ve­lop so­lu­tions across dis­ci­pli­na­ry boun­da­ries. This is a skill that can be learned. More than 150 stu­dents have al­ready par­ti­ci­pated in a UZH “Entre­pre­neur­ship Boot­camp”.

Read the complete story

Around 20 students are sitting in a circle. In turns, each one pre­sents their idea for a pro­ject or start-up. They talk about the prob­lem they want to solve and how they would go about it. The par­ti­ci­pants then break out into small groups to ex­plore and flesh out the most pro­mis­ing ideas.

Among them is Gregor von Rohr, a student of po­li­tic­al sci­ence and eco­no­mics. He is fas­ci­nat­ed by the idea pre­sent­ed by a me­di­cal stu­dent who en­vi­sa­ges a web plat­form that makes it easier to find par­ti­ci­pants for cli­ni­cal trials through­out Switzer­land. The group is formed and gets to work de­ve­lop­ing the idea, iden­ti­fy­ing tech­ni­cal ob­stac­les, dis­cus­sing po­ten­tial co­ope­ra­tion part­ners and por­ing over financing. 

Basic knowledge of innovation and entrepreneurship

All this takes place at the “Entre­pre­neur­ship Boot­camp”, a course run by the UZH In­no­va­tion Hub. Before the stu­dents form groups for spe­cif­ic pro­jects, they com­plete a course that equips them with a basic know­ledge of in­no­va­tion and entre­pre­neur­ship. It is de­signed to be in­ter­dis­ci­pli­na­ry and trans­dis­ci­pli­nary, es­tab­lish­ing points of re­fe­rence that cross dis­ci­plines and also in­clude non-aca­demic content.

UZH teach­ing staff in psy­cho­lo­gy, edu­ca­tion and eco­no­mics are in­volved, as are prac­ti­tio­ners from the world of busi­ness. The boot­camps are de­signed to get stu­dents ex­ci­ted about in­no­va­tion and entre­pre­neur­ship and to equip them with the right skills and the abi­li­ty to apply them in practice.

How teams function

Gregor von Rohr is not a com­plete stran­ger to the world of entre­pre­neur­ship, having set up a small busi­ness with his class­mates back in high school. When he em­barked on his stu­dies at UZH in the fall of 2024, the 21-year-old knew that he wan­ted to learn more about in­no­va­tion and ma­nage­ment. The Entre­pre­neur­ship Boot­camp came along at just the right moment.

He was par­ti­cu­lar­ly in­te­rest­ed in learn­ing about com­mu­ni­ca­tion within an in­ter­dis­ci­pli­na­ry team and con­vey­ing in­for­ma­tion in an effec­tive and im­pact­ful way with team mem­bers. At the boot­camp, he learned a great deal about how to com­mu­ni­cate across dis­ci­plines, how to give con­struc­tive feed­back, and what makes crea­tive and pro­duc­tive teams.

“The boot­camp brought people to­gether from different sub­ject back­grounds who probably would never have met otherwise.”

Gregor von Rohr

Student of political science and economics

“The boot­camp brought people to­gether from dif­fe­rent sub­ject back­grounds who pro­bab­ly would ne­ver have met other­wise,” says the stu­dent. It al­lowed him to break free of the usual ways of think­ing and in­flu­en­ces. It also helped that the stu­dents weren’t com­pet­ing with one another. “We were like one young family, all pul­ling to­gether,” says von Rohr. “At the be­gin­ning, a start-up is a bit like a needy baby that needs help to get going. And you have to work to­gether to do so.”

The working world of the future

Whether the start-up baby ever actually sees the light of day is se­con­dary, as the boot­camp is pri­ma­ri­ly a trai­ning and prac­tice ground. When stu­dents si­mu­late the process of start­ing a busi­ness in a rea­lis­tic way, they can ac­quire valu­able skills – for exam­ple or­ga­niz­ing them­selves effec­tive­ly in in­ter­dis­ci­pli­na­ry teams.

“We want to em­power gra­du­ates of the pro­gram to think and act in an in­no­va­tive and en­tre­pre­neu­rial way across dif­fe­rent dis­ci­plines,” says Maria Oli­vares, head of in­no­vation at UZH. “It doesn’t mat­ter whether they be­come busi­ness ow­ners or em­ploy­ees, the work­ing world of the fu­ture will be all about in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary col­la­bo­ra­tion in pro­jects and innovations.”

The skills that will mat­ter, she says, are pri­ma­rily those ac­quired in hetero­ge­neous teams: being open-min­ded, think­ing cri­ti­cal­ly, iden­ti­fy­ing prob­lems and work­ing with others to de­ve­lop so­lu­tions. Oli­vares adds: “Ex­cit­ing and suc­cess­ful in­no­va­tions usually arise when peo­ple from dif­fe­rent tech­ni­cal back­grounds share their per­spec­tives and come up with new ideas to­gether.” This is why the boot­camps are de­signed to be both in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary and trans­disciplinary.

A new program

More than 150 stu­dents from UZH have al­ready par­ti­ci­pat­ed in a UZH Entre­pre­neur Boot­camp since 2019. This for­mat is set to be of­fered in a new and im­proved form in the future. To fur­ther pro­mote in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary and trans­dis­ci­pli­nary teaching, start­ing in the 2026 Fall Semes­ter, UZH will be of­fer­ing an ad­di­tio­nal three-semes­ter mi­nor study pro­gram in In­no­va­tion & Entre­pre­neur­ship, ini­tiat­ed by the Vice Pre­sident Re­search Eli­sa­beth Stark. “This pro­ject is a stra­te­gi­cally im­por­tant step to pro­mote the teach­ing of in­no­va­tion and entre­pre­neur­ship and to in­te­grate it in aca­dem­ic edu­ca­tion at an early stage – it’s a pio­neering boost for the Uni­ver­sity of Zurich,” says Eli­sa­beth Stark. It is de­signed not only to strengthen in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary teach­ing, but also to create an en­vi­ron­ment that is con­du­cive to fos­ter­ing entre­pre­neu­rial talent.

The pro­gram is a stand­alone mi­nor aimed at stu­dents who are keen to delve deeper into the to­pic and also want to ac­quire broader me­tho­do­lo­gi­cal know­ledge. The pre­vious boot­camp mo­dules are being fur­ther deve­loped and in­te­grat­ed into the mi­nor pro­gram in a new form. But they can also still be cho­sen as in­di­vi­dual mo­dules for stu­dents who don’t want to de­di­cate a whole mi­nor to the topic of innovation.

Open-minded and eager to learn across disciplinary boundaries: Gregor von Rohr (left) in conver­sation with entre­preneur and start-up consultant Jan Fülscher.

Refer­ring to what the two pro­grams have in com­mon, entre­pre­neur and start-up con­sultant Jan Fülscher says: “As with the boot­camps, we want this to ap­peal to stu­dents from all dis­ci­plines.” Fülscher is help­ing Maria Oli­vares’ team de­sign fu­ture cour­ses that are geared to­ward busi­ness and entre­pre­neur­ship. As op­posed to other in­sti­tu­tions that of­ten fo­cus too heavi­ly on high-tech, UZH wants its in­no­va­tion cour­ses to ap­peal to stu­dents of all dis­ci­plines. As Jan Fül­scher says: “In­no­va­tion is re­le­vant across all sec­tions of so­ci­ety and the eco­no­my. We need in­no­va­tive law­yers just as much as we need in­no­va­tive biologists.”

Harnessing opportunities

Gregor von Rohr also in­tends to stay true to what he has learned in the course: en­gag­ing with other dis­ci­plines in an open-mind­ed way and being in­tel­lec­tual­ly cu­ri­ous. His next step will take him to the US for an ex­change year. When he re­turns to UZH, he will con­tinue to look for in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary and trans­dis­ci­pli­nary cour­ses to make sure he has the skills he needs to take con­trol of his fu­ture and find his own path. Be­cause to him it is clear that life is not mapped out as a straight line and has many op­por­tu­ni­ties and sur­pri­ses in store. So he wants to be prepared.

Teaming up to find solu­tions for con­flicts of use in Zurich’s Bäcker­an­lage: Markus Meile (City of Zurich), Eveline Oder­matt (Cen­ter for Crisis Com­pe­tence UZH) and Ger­man stu­dies doc­toral stu­dent Chiara Diener.

A More Joined-Up Approach

In a semi­nar at the UZH Center for Crisis Com­pe­tence, stu­dents work across dis­ci­plines to iden­tify con­crete so­lu­tions to ur­ban con­flicts. For exam­ple, in Zurich’s Bäcker­an­lage park.

Read the complete story

The Bäcker­an­lage is an oasis in the heart of the city of Zu­rich. With huge trees, green space, a paddl­ing pool for chil­dren and a res­tau­rant, the park is po­pu­lar with peo­ple of all ages. Since the 1970s, it has also fre­quent­ly been used as a meet­ing place by home­less peo­ple and drug users. This has led to con­flicts be­tween the dif­fe­rent user groups – and to calls from policy­makers for a crack­down on drug users and dealers. The question that keeps aris­ing is there­fore: how can this space be used peacefully?

It is not only a po­li­ti­cally re­le­vant ques­tion, but also a sci­en­ti­fi­cal­ly in­te­rest­ing one, says Chiara Diener. In her thesis, the PhD can­di­date in Ger­man stu­dies is ex­plor­ing in­ter­ac­tions be­tween peo­ple in so­cial spa­ces – but with a fo­cus on theo­re­ti­cal as­pects. Along­side her thesis, she com­plet­ed a mo­dule at UZH in which she was able to con­si­der the topic on the ba­sis of a real-life so­cial hot spot. She was in­te­rest­ed in the ques­tion of whe­ther the spa­tial de­sign of the Bäcker­an­lage park is part of the rea­son why con­flicts arise.

The mo­dule is called “Cri­sis and the City: Ur­ban Chal­len­ges and Cri­sis Com­pe­tence in Zu­rich’s Ur­ban Space” and is run by the Cen­ter for Cri­sis Com­pe­tence at the Uni­ver­sity of Zu­rich. The idea be­hind the course is that par­ti­ci­pants work in in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary pairs to ex­plore issues that have led to con­flicts and cri­ses in the city. Be­sides con­flicts in pub­lic spa­ces, this also con­cerns issues such as the pan­de­mic and cli­mate change.

The need for an open mind

Chiara Diener and a re­li­gious stu­dies stu­dent came to­gether over their shared in­te­rest in a spe­ci­fic sci­en­ti­fic me­thod for ana­lyz­ing spa­ces. The other stu­dent had al­ready used the me­thod, and Die­ner was in­te­rest­ed in doing so, too. So the pair in­ves­ti­gat­ed the Bäcker­an­lage, equipped with me­tho­do­lo­gi­cal texts, ca­me­ra and open eyes and ears.

In the joint se­mes­ter pa­per, Die­ner pri­ma­ri­ly put for­ward so­cio­lo­gi­cal theo­ries on ur­ban space, and the re­li­gious stu­dies stu­dent fo­cused on the his­to­ri­cal view of the park. To­gether, they con­clud­ed that the space was in­deed big enough for the va­ri­ous groups to co­exist. How­ever, the re­le­vant parts of the space are not suf­fi­cient­ly se­pa­rat­ed from each other – an issue that could be solved through struc­tu­ral measures.

“I realized why certain climate protection measures aren’t as easy to implement as we might think from the outside. Everything needs to have a legal basis and has to undergo a political process.”

Chiara Diener

PhD candidate in German Studies

For Chiara Die­ner, the ex­pe­ri­ence was valu­able in se­ve­ral res­pects. On the one hand, she was able to apply a new me­thod. On the other, the co­ope­ra­tion was above all an exer­cise in open­ness. “You need to be open-minded to be able to write a pa­per with some­one else, rather than on your own as you usual­ly do. And the out­come is very dif­fe­rent if you work with some­one from a dif­fe­rent sub­ject area who has a dif­fe­rent way of see­ing things and brings other per­spec­tives to the table.”

Unique collaboration

Broad­en­ing ho­ri­zons, com­bin­ing dif­fe­rent sub­ject per­spec­tives, and ana­lyz­ing a con­crete so­ci­etal chal­lenge: these are the very skills that the mo­dule on ur­ban chal­len­ges and cri­ses pro­motes. The mo­dule, open to Mas­ter’s and PhD can­di­dates, is not only in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary, but also trans­dis­ci­pli­nary, and was run by UZH’s Cen­ter for Cri­sis Com­pe­tence in the 2024 Fall Se­mes­ter for the first time. As well as co­ver­ing dif­fe­rent dis­ci­plines, it also sought to in­volve part­ners from out­side the university.

During the pan­de­mic, it be­came clear that com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween the sci­ence com­mu­ni­ty and so­ci­ety isn’t al­ways op­ti­mal. This gave rise to the idea of a co­ope­ra­tion be­tween the uni­ver­si­ty and the City of Zu­rich. As part of the three-year pro­ject, UZH is also for the first time or­ga­niz­ing a course in col­la­bo­ra­tion with the city.

In terms of con­tent, the course ex­plored the con­flicts and cri­ses faced by the city of Zu­rich, and how the city can brace for fu­ture cri­ses. The mo­dule is split into the­ma­tic blocks, each of which is de­di­cat­ed to a spe­ci­fic ur­ban challenge.

Valuable discussions

By way of pre­pa­ra­tion, the stu­dents read texts from dif­fe­rent dis­ci­plines on the sub­ject in ques­tion. The course takes a co-teach­ing ap­proach, where­by ex­perts from the uni­ver­si­ty and from the city ad­mi­ni­stra­tion each con­tri­bute their know­ledge and per­spec­tive. Par­ti­ci­pants also vi­sit lo­ca­tions that pose chal­len­ges in the city to­gether – such as the Bäcker­an­lage park or a re­fu­gee shelter.

Thirty stu­dents from five fa­cul­ties took part in the first edi­tion of the mo­dule, tak­ing the rare op­por­tu­ni­ty to step out­side of their sub­ject areas and en­gage with dif­fe­rent points of view. Chiara Die­ner was par­ti­cu­lar­ly in­te­res­ted in the fol­low­ing ques­tions: what do po­li­ti­cal sci­en­tists think about how emer­gen­cy le­gis­la­tion should be le­gi­ti­mized in a cri­sis? And what can so­cio­lo­gists tell us about how measures to tackle cli­mate change can be made so­cial­ly ac­cep­ta­ble? “Ex­pe­ri­enc­ing this pooled and wide-rang­ing ex­per­tise was really im­pres­sive,” says the PhD candidate.

One of the eye-openers for her was the in­volve­ment of re­pre­sen­ta­tives from the City of Zu­rich. She says that the in­sight into the le­gal and po­li­ti­cal con­di­tions and the con­straints of a city ad­mi­ni­stra­tion made a real im­pact. “I real­ized why cer­tain cli­mate pro­tec­tion mea­sures aren’t as easy to im­ple­ment as we might think from the out­side. Every­thing needs to have a le­gal ba­sis and has to un­der­go a po­li­ti­cal process.”

Better solutions

“This is pre­cise­ly why the trans­dis­ci­pli­na­ry ap­proach is worth­while,” says Eveline Oder­matt. The so­cial sci­en­tist at the Cen­ter for Cri­sis Com­pe­tence co-de­signed, co­or­di­nat­ed and co-led the mo­dule as a mem­ber of the teach­ing staff. “If we com­bine the ap­proaches of dif­fe­rent sub­ject areas with real-world per­spec­tives, we can find bet­ter so­lu­tions to prob­lems. This is par­ti­cu­lar­ly true in a world in which the chal­len­ges are be­com­ing ever more com­plex and more global.”

A change in perspective: Markus Meile, Eveline Odermatt and Chiara Diener on the rooftop of the pavilion in Bäckeranlage.

But it’s not just the so­lu­tions that are bet­ter, the learn­ing out­comes are greater, too. As soon as other fields or ac­tors from out­side the uni­ver­si­ty are in­volved, re­sear­chers have to think more about their own role, and ask them­selves what they even mean by cr­isis and cri­sis re­silience, and what val­ues they bring to the dis­cus­sion. “When work­ing with others, this has to be clear and trans­pa­rent,” says Odermatt.

A question of time

German stu­dies scholar Chiara Die­ner says that from her ex­pe­ri­ence, put­ting your­self in some­one else’s shoes is the big­gest chal­lenge. “It takes a long time to move away from your own view­point and to ex­change dif­fe­rent per­spec­tives – this one-se­mes­ter mo­dule was just the be­gin­ning of the process.”

Markus Meile, chief of staff of the Zurich mu­ni­ci­pal cri­sis office, is open to the idea of con­tinu­ing the col­la­bo­ra­tion be­tween the uni­ver­si­ty and the city. He says: “We were im­me­dia­tely ex­cit­ed when UZH ap­proached us about a col­la­bo­ra­tive course.” He be­lieves that par­ti­ci­pa­tion in the cur­rent pro­ject has al­ready paid off, re­fer­ring to the dis­cus­sions and se­mes­ter pa­pers that stu­dents have writ­ten on to­pics such as heat re­duc­tion, the hou­sing cri­sis and con­flicts in pub­lic spa­ces. “This work has con­tri­but­ed in­sights and new ideas that en­hance our point of view as a city,” he says.

The mo­dule on ur­ban chal­len­ges and cri­sis com­pe­tence is to be of­fered a se­cond time in the 2026 Spring Se­mes­ter. Eveline Oder­matt is con­fi­dent that the idea can be scaled up – be­yond col­la­bo­ra­tion with the city autho­rity, for exam­ple to ci­vil so­ci­ety or­ga­ni­za­tions and the pub­lic. In this way, the mo­dule could be­come a mo­del for a new type of teach­ing that en­han­ces the per­spec­tives of all involved.

How does a child see the world? As a mentor, economics student Andri Brühwiler learned to see things from a young person's perspective.

Learning from Children

A unique kind of course at UZH gives stu­dents the op­por­tu­nity to men­tor chil­dren and teen­agers from socially dis­ad­van­taged back­grounds. There’s hardly a bet­ter way to illus­trate what chil­dren need to grow and thrive.

Read the complete story

Andri Brüh­wi­ler de­cid­ed to take part in the men­tor­ing pro­gram as it was a chance to be im­mersed in another cul­ture. Over the space of a year, the eco­no­mics stu­dent at the Uni­ver­sity of Zu­rich met weekly with a nine-year-old pri­mary school pu­pil whose par­ents had fled to Switzer­land as Syrian Kurd refu­gees. Brüh­wiler helped the boy with his aca­dem­ic chal­len­ges. This re­quired empa­thy to re­cog­nize the boy’s needs and to see where he was strug­gling. But most im­por­tant­ly, Brüh­wiler needed to under­stand the boy’s ex­pec­ta­tions and where he could really help and sup­port him.

It was a steep learn­ing curve for the UZH stu­dent. The first thing he re­al­ized was that his men­tee didn’t have a work­space at home where he could do his home­work. So they start­ed by set­ting one up to­gether. Gra­dual­ly, Brüh­wiler won over the young boy’s trust, so he felt com­for­table talk­ing to the stu­dent about his weak­nes­ses. The boy was strug­gling with Ger­man, a little dis­or­ga­nized, and lacked stay­ing power in his learning.

“Mentoring meant I needed skills that I’ve never needed so far at university.”

Andri Brühwiler

Economics student

Brühwiler drew on all his skills and ex­pe­ri­ence – both his own jour­ney through the edu­ca­tion sys­tem and what he had learned at uni­ver­sity. Be­cause for stu­dents, men­tor­ing young kids is like being thrown in at the deep end – only with a safe­ty net. The men­tor­ing is em­bed­ded in a course at the uni­ver­si­ty, with the mo­dule “Men­tor­ing for the Next Ge­ne­ra­tion” in­tro­duced at UZH in 2023.

An adaptive and malleable brain

Teaching staff from the sub­jects edu­cation, psy­cho­logy and eco­no­mics pre­pare the fu­ture men­tors for the task ahead. In the in­tro­duc­tory ses­sions, they share their in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary know­ledge with stu­dents, spe­ci­fi­cally look­ing at what chil­dren need to thrive and what makes for effec­tive men­tor­ing. Their core mes­sage is al­ways that our brains are mal­leable and can adapt. What a child can’t learn today, they might be able to learn tomorrow.

Over the course of two se­mes­ters, stu­dents also attend se­ve­ral group coaching ses­sions and en­gage in op­tion­al one-on-one ses­sions to ad­dress any issues.

Above all, how­ever, the aim is for stu­dents to ac­quire new skills when in­ter­acting and en­gag­ing with their men­tees. This is what the course is all about: pro­mot­ing em­pa­thy and self-con­fi­dence and de­ve­lop­ing prob­lem-solving skills.

Educational opportunities for all

The men­tor­ing mo­dule at UZH was ini­ti­ated by the city of Zu­rich’s asy­lum or­ga­ni­za­tion (AOZ). The or­ga­ni­za­tion’s mis­sion is to pro­vide chil­dren from so­cial­ly dis­ad­van­taged back­grounds with access to qua­li­ty edu­ca­tion. To this end, it runs the “Future Kids” men­tor­ing pro­gram, which is open to stu­dents from va­ri­ous uni­ver­si­ties and allows them to men­tor chil­dren and teen­agers across the can­ton of Zu­rich. There is a great deal of de­mand for men­tors from pri­ma­ry schools, which is why the AOZ asked the Uni­ver­si­ty of Zu­rich if it wan­ted to get in­vol­ved, too.

“Social skills and emotional intelligence are precisely the skills that will continue to be in demand in the jobs market in future as they can’t be replaced by artificial intelligence.”

Ulf Zölitz

Professor of Economics for Child and Youth Development

Ulf Zölitz jumped at the chance. The pro­fes­sor at the De­part­ment of Eco­no­mics and at UZH’s Jacobs Center for Pro­duc­tive Youth De­ve­lop­ment stu­dies these very ques­tions in his re­search, name­ly how chil­dren can be helped to ful­fill their po­ten­tial and how equa­li­ty can be im­proved in edu­ca­tion. The pro­fes­sor has al­ready run the men­tor­ing pro­gram twice. In each edi­tion, around 30 stu­dents from dif­fe­rent sub­ject areas at UZH take part – and the pro­gram is being run for the third time in the 2025 Fall Semester.

Learn from each other

The course pri­ma­ri­ly de­ve­lops par­ti­ci­pants’ so­cial skills and emo­tion­al in­tel­li­gence. “These are pre­cise­ly the skills that will con­tinue to be in de­mand in the jobs mar­ket in fu­ture as they can’t be re­placed by arti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence,” says Zölitz. They are key com­pe­ten­cies that are set to be­come more im­por­tant in every oc­cu­pa­tio­nal field, he adds. The course there­fore not only ap­peals to stu­dents who are keen to be­come teach­ers, like Andri Brühwiler.

Mentoring requires spontaneity: Professor Ulf Zölitz (left) and student Andri Brühwiler.

In his re­flec­tion pa­per, the eco­no­mics stu­dent de­scribes how the men­tor­ing scheme im­pact­ed him. “Men­tor­ing meant I needed skills that I’ve ne­ver needed so far at uni­ver­si­ty,” he says. He re­al­ized that patience is one of his great­est strengths. “At the same time, I got the chance to prac­tice being flex­ible and think­ing on my feet – things I used to find dif­fi­cult,” says the 27-year-old. Some­times, des­pite me­ti­cu­lous plan­ning, he would have to change his plans at the last minute – if, for exam­ple, his men­tee had for­got­ten that he had an exam or pre­sen­ta­tion the next day and needed help with it.

The chil­dren and teen­agers were also asked to give re­gu­lar feed­back to stu­dents on the kind of sup­port they wan­ted to re­ceive. The course is an op­por­tu­nity for stu­dents from dif­fe­rent sub­jects to com­pare notes and share tips, for example on how to mo­ti­vate their men­tees and on the best stra­te­gies to help the pu­pils with schoolwork.

What a difference

Andri Brüh­wiler was de­light­ed to see how, over the course of the year, his men­tee be­came more con­fi­dent speaking Ger­man and was more mo­ti­vat­ed and or­ga­nized with his school­work. “It was im­pres­sive to see how much of a dif­fe­rence two hours a week can make.” The ex­pe­ri­ence also re­mind­ed him of how un­equal dif­fe­rent peo­ple’s edu­ca­tio­nal op­por­tu­ni­ties are: “My pa­rents al­ways sup­por­ted me. But not all pa­rents can do that, if only be­cause they don’t have the lan­guage skills.”

Strengthened reflective competence: Theology student Alina Ring benefited from the module “Ethics and Responsibility”.

The Courage to Make Ethical Decisions

We con­stant­ly have to make de­cis­ions in life and it’s not al­ways easy to judge what is ethi­cal­ly right. UZH gives stu­dents the op­por­tu­nity to hone their ethi­cal competence.

Read the complete story

Theo­logy stu­dent Alina Ring has an un­usual part-time job. The 26-year-old is a chap­lain in the Swiss Armed Forces. If, for example, a re­cruit wants to talk, she tra­vels to In­fan­try School 12 in Chur. The con­ver­sa­tion might be about mi­li­tary or per­son­al problems.

As a chap­lain, Alina Ring is bound to pro­fes­sion­al secrecy. Having said that, if the con­ver­sa­tion re­veals that some­one is a dan­ger to them­self or others, she can break the duty of se­cre­cy – but she is not ob­liged to. “Lucki­ly, this si­tu­ation has ne­ver oc­curred so far,” says Ring. “Be­cause it’d pose an ethi­cal di­lem­ma for me: Should I res­pect the fact that some­one has told me some­thing in con­fi­dence? Or is the prio­rity to pro­tect a life that may be at risk?”

Alina Ring fre­quent­ly faces these sorts of ethi­cal ques­tions, both in her pri­vate life and in her stu­dies, from de­cid­ing what causes to do­nate to, to form­ing an opin­ion on as­sist­ed sui­cide. As part of her theo­lo­gy de­gree she al­ready at­tend­ed a com­pul­sory course on ethics but she says she felt it didn’t equip her to actual­ly make ethi­cal de­cis­ions. And she is sure that she will also face such ques­tions in her chosen pro­fes­sion as pastor and pri­son chaplain. 

Gaining confidence

In order to gain more con­fi­dence in handl­ing ethi­cal de­cis­ions, she en­rolled in the mo­dule “What Shall We Do? Ethi­cal Judg­ment and Mo­ral Com­pe­tence”. The School for Trans­dis­ci­pli­nary Stu­dies (STS) offered the mo­dule deve­loped by the UZH In­sti­tute of So­cial Ethics for the first time in the 2025 Spring Se­mes­ter. Some 30 stu­dents from va­ri­ous dis­ci­plines took part.

The module “What Shall We Do? Ethical Judgment and Moral Competence” provides confidence in making ethical decisions.

“We want to raise par­ti­ci­pants’ aware­ness of ethi­cal as­pects in de­ci­sion-mak­ng, and equip them to make such de­ci­sions,” says Lea Chilian, senior teach­ing and re­search as­sis­tant at the In­sti­tute of So­cial Ethics and co­or­di­na­tor of the mo­dule. Chilian is con­vinced that mak­ing ethi­cal de­cis­ions is be­com­ing in­creas­ing­ly im­por­tant in today’s world. One of the main rea­sons for this is glo­ba­li­zation, as it makes in­ter­con­nec­tions more com­plex. For example, the food and clothes I choose to buy have an en­vi­ron­ment­al and so­cial im­pact all over the world. What’s more, these days we are con­front­ed with a host of mo­ral con­cepts on which we are sup­posed to have an opinion.

“Ethical competence is particularly important for students as academics often work in jobs with a great deal of respon­sibility and decision-making power.”

Lea Chilian

Senior teaching and research assistant at the Institute of Social Ethics

As well as glo­ba­li­za­tion, tech­no­lo­gic­al pro­gress also raises new ques­tions, such as how much a me­di­cal treat­ment should cost, and what de­cis­ions we should de­le­gate to ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence. “Ethi­cal com­pe­tence is par­ti­cu­lar­ly im­por­tant for stu­dents as aca­de­mics of­ten work in jobs with a great deal of res­pon­si­bi­li­ty and de­ci­sion-mak­ing power – and that con­cerns all fields of study,” says Chilian.

Other people’s values

“Doing jus­tice to the com­ple­xi­ty of an ethi­cal de­ci­sion re­quires in-depth re­flec­tion,” says Chilian. A good de­ci­sion is cha­rac­te­rized by an at­tempt to take ac­count of all as­pects and ac­tors re­lat­ed to an issue. And be­cause every aca­dem­ic dis­ci­pline has its own ques­tions and often its own set of values, it makes sense to en­gage across dis­ci­plines and to ex­plore the fun­da­ment­al prin­ci­ples of de­cision-making.

The “Ethics and Res­pon­si­bi­lity” mo­dule in­volved teach­ing staff from the dis­ci­plines of phi­lo­so­phy – with its spe­cial­ist field of ethics and me­di­cal ethics, for example – and theo­logy. Guests were also in­vit­ed to talk about how they ap­proach ethi­cal issues in their work – for example a law­yer from a soft­ware firm.

“The opportunity to look beyond disciplinary borders was particularly valuable.”

Alina Ring

Theology student

For Alina Ring, the op­por­tu­ni­ty to look be­yond dis­ci­pli­nary bor­ders was par­ti­cu­lar­ly valu­able. This is be­cause her sub­ject – theo­logy – deals with the Chris­tian value sys­tem, in which cha­ri­ty and a wil­ling­ness to for­give are pi­vo­tal. “But when it comes to weigh­ing up these values in a spe­ci­fic case and reach­ing an ethi­cal de­ci­sion, theo­logy doesn’t offer any mo­dels,” says Ring. She there­fore found it all the more valu­able to learn about the mo­dels of ethi­cal de­ci­sion-mak­ing, as de­ve­loped in phi­lo­so­phy, for example.

Expanding the toolbox

The se­mi­nar aimed to help stu­dents find their own in­di­vi­dual way of mak­ing co­he­rent ethi­cal de­ci­sions. “We aim to pro­vide stu­dents with a tool­box of dif­fe­rent meth­ods,” says Chilian.

Alina Ring found a good so­lu­tion in the tool­box in the form of a spe­ci­fic ethi­cal de­ci­sion-mak­ing meth­od. This meth­od in­volves ga­ther­ing facts, nam­ing the prob­lem, ana­lyz­ing and weigh­ing up the ar­gu­ments, and mak­ing a de­ci­sion. At the same time, the course helped Ring gain cla­ri­ty on her own values – an es­sen­tial step in de­ci­sion-mak­ing. She now knows that so­li­da­ri­ty, for­give­ness, equa­li­ty, kindn­ess and authen­ti­ci­ty are what matter most to her.

Finding pathways that lead to a well-grounded ethical judgment: Instructor Lea Chilian and student Alina Ring.

The course par­ti­ci­pants also com­plet­ed a piece of writ­ten work in small in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary groups which was de­signed to sen­si­tize them to ethi­cal ar­gu­ments. Their task was to in­ter­view a person of their choosing about how they make ethi­cal de­ci­sions in their day-to-day work. Alina Ring was part of a team of three that chose a topic that was par­ti­cu­lar­ly in­te­rest­ing to her. Work­ing with a doc­tor­al stu­dent in psy­cho­logy and a mu­sic his­to­ry stu­dent, she in­ter­viewed a re­cruit­ment psy­cho­lo­gist from the Swiss Armed Forces.

It remains difficult

After com­plet­ing the mo­dule, Alina Ring con­cludes that it takes cour­age to make ethi­cal de­ci­sions, but that mo­dels and theo­ries pro­vide re­as­su­rance. It didn’t be­come any easier for her to make such de­ci­sions. In fact, the course taught her how com­plex ethi­cal di­lem­mas can be. This is a fa­mil­iar ex­pe­rience for in­struc­tor Lea Chilian: “With in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary cour­ses, stu­dents often have more ques­tions after­wards than they did be­fore­hand. But that’s a good sign – it means they have re­cog­nized the mul­ti­fa­ce­ted na­ture of a topic,” says Chilian.

Alina Ring now feels more con­fi­dent with her new set of tools when it comes to ethi­cal ques­tions. Coming back to her ini­tial di­lem­ma, she is un­able to give a ge­ne­ral ans­wer to the ques­tion of whe­ther in an emer­gen­cy she would break her duty of se­cre­cy as a mi­li­ta­ry chap­lain. What she does know is that there is not just one ans­wer: “But after com­plet­ing this mo­dule, I’d be able to keep a cool head, think the si­tu­ation through, and be able to own my decision.”

The new inter­disciplinary Master's program in Evolutionary Language Science builds bridges between linguistics, biology, computer science, brain research, and philosophy.

Diving into the World of Languages

How did the world’s lan­guages ori­gi­nate – and how will we com­mu­ni­cate in future? A new Master’s degree pro­gram at UZH ex­plores these ques­tions – from a uniquely broad perspective.

Read the complete story

French fries not only help sate your hun­ger; they could also help you learn Chi­nese. This is be­cause their baton shape can be used to form Chi­nese cha­rac­ters, as dis­co­vered by Se­rai­na Bet­schart when she got a Chi­nese fel­low stu­dent to ex­plain some prin­ci­ples of her na­tive lan­guage over lunch. The two lan­guage en­thu­si­asts have been en­rolled in the Mas­ter’s pro­gram in Evo­lu­tio­na­ry Lan­guage Sci­ence since fall 2025.

The game with the French fries was not just for fun, but for mu­tual be­ne­fit. The Chi­nese stu­dent was ask­ing Se­rai­na Bet­schart for help with a cod­ing task as she want­ed to ana­lyze an as­pect of the Chi­nese lan­guage using a com­pu­ter pro­gram. This was no problem for Bet­schart, who has a Ba­che­lor’s de­gree in com­pu­ta­tion­al lin­gu­is­tics. But to be able to help her class­mate, Bet­schart first needed to better under­stand the struc­ture of the Chi­nese lan­guage – which is where the French fries came in.

“I am keen to learn as many languages as possible”

Seraina Betschart

Student of Evolutionary Language Science

The lunch was a win-win: the Chi­nese stu­dent re­ceived the su­pport she needed and Se­rai­na Bet­schart wel­comes any op­por­tu­ni­ty to learn more about lan­guages. While in other people, learn­ing another lan­guage sounds more like a half-hearted New Year’s re­so­lu­tion, it is a core part of her life. Be­sides all of Switzer­land’s na­tion­al lan­guages, she also start­ed learn­ing Es­to­nian a few years ago – a lan­guage from a com­ple­tely dif­fe­rent fa­mily for a change. The lan­guage she cur­rent­ly wants to learn next is Arabic.

It doesn’t get more interdisciplinary

In other res­pects too, Se­rai­na Bet­schart is keen to learn as much as pos­sible about lan­guages: how did hu­man lan­guage deve­lop? What’s the dif­fe­rence be­tween ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion and hu­man lan­guages? And how will we talk to each other and to ma­chines in fu­ture in the age of di­gi­ta­li­za­tion and ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence? These are pre­cise­ly the ques­tions at the heart of the Mas­ter’s pro­gram in Evo­lu­tio­na­ry Lan­guage Sci­ence, which was launched at the Uni­ver­sity of Zu­rich in the 2025 Fall Semester. The two-year pro­gram is de­signed as a single-subject Mas­ter’s with­out any minor sub­jects. It is run by the In­sti­tute for the In­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary Study of Lan­guage Evo­lu­tion at UZH.

The word “in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary” is par­ti­cu­lar­ly apt, as the pro­gram co­vers a broad range of topics and is equally broad in terms of the dis­ci­plines it covers. Lin­guis­tic re­search at the in­sti­tute has been taking place for years in close col­la­bo­ra­tion with bio­lo­gists at UZH. For example, a joint study is being con­duct­ed into the ex­tent to which the lan­guages of the world have evolved in pa­ral­lel with human genes.

“An interdisciplinary breadth that you probably won’t find at any other university in the world”

Paul Widmer

Program director

“Through the new Mas­ter’s pro­gram, we are once again tak­ing co­ope­ra­tion with other dis­ci­plines to a com­ple­tely new level – in­clud­ing in teach­ing,” says pro­gram di­rec­tor Paul Wid­mer. Nine UZH dis­ci­plines are in­volved, from phi­lo­so­phy and mathe­ma­tics to com­puter sci­ence and brain re­search. Stu­dents also ac­quire di­gi­tal skills, such as cod­ing. “This is a de­gree pro­gram with an in­ter­dis­ci­pli­na­ry breadth that you pro­bab­ly won’t find at any other uni­ver­si­ty in the world,” says Widmer.

From breadth to depth

The stu­dents’ back­grounds are also di­verse. In this first edi­tion, there is a small group of nine stu­dents. Their na­tive lan­guages are Ger­man, Chi­nese, Hin­di and Eng­lish. They also bring dif­fe­rent per­spec­tives and know­ledge from the sub­jects they stu­died at Ba­che­lor’s level. Some stu­died lin­guis­tics, others psy­cho­lo­gy, his­to­ry, or com­pu­ta­tio­nal lin­guis­tics – like Serai­na Betschart.

For Bet­schart, the dis­ci­pli­na­ry di­ver­si­ty was the main reason she opted for the pro­gram. “I’m keen to add a sci­en­tif­ic per­spec­tive to the lin­guis­tic and com­pu­ter-orien­ted ap­proach from my Ba­che­lor’s de­gree.” It’s im­pres­sive, she says how the ques­tions and meth­ods con­sis­tent­ly feed into and build on one another. For example, a be­havioral re­sear­cher came to a class to re­port on ex­pe­ri­ments being con­duct­ed using ma­chine learn­ing to de­code the lan­guage of Bo­no­bo primates.

Putting the pieces of the puzzle together

Both teach­ing staff and stu­dents are ex­plor­ing new ground through the pro­gram. “In every ses­sion, we need to ask ques­tions and fi­gure out what prior know­ledge the stu­dents have,” says Piera Filip­pi, sci­en­ti­fic co­or­di­na­tor for the pro­gram. De­pend­ing on the ques­tion and the tech­ni­cal back­ground, the stu­dents some­times even know more about a cer­tain as­pect than the in­struc­tors. Peer-to-peer ex­change is key, which is why every­one needs to make an ef­fort to com­mu­ni­cate clearly, says Filippi. The goal is to en­sure a shared un­der­stand­ing of the con­cepts, meth­ods and ob­jec­tives across all the par­ti­ci­pat­ing disciplines.

“Set clear priorities in their study”

Piera Filippi

Scientific coordinator for the program

Another chal­lenge of the new pro­gram is strik­ing the right ba­lance be­tween the breadth of sub­ject areas and the ne­ces­sary depth. “By the time they com­plete the pro­gram, par­ti­ci­pants should un­der­stand the core con­cepts of all the par­ti­ci­pat­ing dis­ci­plines, but also set clear prio­ri­ties in their study,” says Filippi. They are there­fore asked to choose two fo­cus areas and to com­bine them in their Mas­ter’s thesis.

Bet­schart, who is in the first se­mes­ter of the Mas­ter’s, doesn’t yet know what her focus areas will be. But with her prior know­ledge of com­pu­ter sci­ence and mathe­matics, she can ima­gine tak­ing a cer­tain di­rec­tion, namely com­par­ing lan­guages and their his­to­ric­al evo­lu­tion using data analy­ses. But first of all, what she wants to do is gain an over­view of the wealth of issues, dis­ci­plines and re­search ap­proaches. “The chal­lenge is to put the in­di­vi­dual pie­ces to­gether to see the big­ger pic­ture – like a puzzle,” says Bet­schart.

Close supervision

Stu­dents are not left to their own de­vi­ces. “Be­cause the pro­gram is new and un­usual, the sup­port we pro­vide to stu­dents is more in­ten­sive,” says co­or­di­na­tor Filippi. We con­duct one-to-one ses­sions with stu­dents to help them choose the right course mo­dules and later to figure out a ques­tion for their Mas­ter’s thesis.

The stu­dents are also well in­te­grat­ed into re­search. It helps that the “Evolv­ing Lan­guage” Na­tion­al Cen­ter of Com­pe­tence in Re­search is based at the In­sti­tute for the In­ter­dis­ci­pli­na­ry Study of Lan­guage Evo­lu­tion. This allows stu­dents to be in­volved in in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary re­search pro­jects early on.

The Master’s program in Evolutionary Language Science also addresses the topic of animal communication. Seraina Betschart records the vocalizations of meerkats, a particularly communicative animal species.

Serai­na Bet­schart doesn’t know yet what path she wants to take after she fi­nishes her stu­dies. But she hopes that her fu­ture job will offer op­por­tu­ni­ties for in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary work­ing. Mean­while, pro­gram di­rec­tor Paul Wid­mer says: “The job mar­ket first needs to get to know the new study pro­gram and un­der­stand the unique skills it gives stu­dents.” There are so many pos­si­bi­li­ties. Gra­duates of the pro­gram are trained in in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary col­la­bo­ra­tion, so they will be strong team play­ers with ex­pe­ri­ence in deal­ing with com­plex chal­len­ges. The pos­sible pro­fes­sion­al ap­pli­ca­tions are broad, rang­ing from aca­dem­ic careers in his­to­ric­al lin­guis­tic re­search to jobs in the clini­cal treat­ment of speech dis­or­ders, for example.

School for Trans­dis­ci­pli­nary Studies

As a com­pre­hen­sive uni­ver­sity with the most com­pre­hen­sive range of aca­dem­ic pro­grams in Switzer­land, UZH pro­vides ex­cel­lent con­di­tions to fa­ci­li­tate in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary edu­ca­tion­al path­ways. UZH has been mak­ing greater use of this po­ten­tial for a num­ber of years. It spe­ci­fi­cal­ly pro­motes pro­grams that allow stu­dents to take ad­van­tage of the wide range of dis­ci­plines covered by the uni­ver­sity. The School for Trans­dis­ci­pli­na­ry Stu­dies (STS) – the first of its kind in Switzer­land – was set up at UZH in 2021 and plays a key role here.

The STS offers a course pro­gram on cross-dis­ci­pli­nary skills that is open to stu­dents from all fa­cul­ties, and works close­ly with the fa­cul­ties to de­ve­lop an in­ter­dis­ci­pli­na­ry and trans­dis­ci­pli­nary core of­fering with mo­dules to pro­vide di­rec­tion that often fol­low a pro­ject- or prob­lem-based learn­ing ap­proach. Stu­dents work on to­pic­al and prac­tic­al ques­tions under the super­vi­sion of in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary teams of in­struc­tors. This gives them a first-hand in­sight into how re­ward­ing and also chal­leng­ing it can be to work across sub­ject areas. They learn to bring to­gether dif­fe­rent per­spec­tives, to handle ten­sions con­struc­tive­ly and to work col­la­bo­ra­tive­ly to de­ve­lop work­able solutions.

The School for Trans­dis­ci­pli­nary Stu­dies ce­le­brat­ed its 5th an­ni­ver­sary on 29 Octo­ber 2025 as part of the Tag der Lehre (Day of Ex­cel­lence in Teaching).

School for Transdisciplinary Studies

Loading ...